Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Um, what were they saying about "irresponsible"?

Today, a man was attacked by a dog in the pound so severely that he had to be taken to the hospital.

Published: 2010-03-16
Man bitten at Metro SPCA
Pest control technician treated at hospital after attack

A man was taken to hospital after he was bitten by a dog at the Metro SPCA shelter.


Police and paramedics were called to the animal shelter at 5 Scarfe Ct. in Dartmouth at about 11:40 a.m. Monday after a reported dog bite.

The shelter is closed to the public on Mondays, but staff and volunteers are there to care for the animals.

"We had a technician come in, a pest control technician," said Kristin Williams, executive director of the Nova Scotia SPCA.

"Unfortunately, he entered a back area without an escort and he encountered one of our dogs and was bitten in the hand and taken to hospital."

Krista Beck, a spokeswoman for Emergency Health Services, said later Monday that the man was taken to the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre in Halifax with injuries to his hand and possibly his leg. The injuries were not life-threatening, Beck said.

Halifax Regional Police were called to the shelter because it was believed the dog was not secure, which turned out to be untrue, said spokesman Const. Brian Palmeter.

At the time of the attack, the female mixed-breed dog "was getting some R&R social time (outside of its kennel), but it was still a restricted area," Williams said.

The dog, described as a young adult canine, has been at the shelter since August, when it was seized by order of Halifax Regional Municipality, Williams said. It was not part of any cruelty investigation, she said.

She didn’t know whether the dog had bitten anyone prior to arriving at the shelter last summer but said it hadn’t bitten anyone at the shelter before this.


"This was an isolated incident and we obviously feel very sorry for the individual and hope that he has a quick recovery," Williams said.

The Metro SPCA, which had the municipal animal control contract, has a handful of dogs at the shelter that are awaiting proceedings to determine their fate, including Brindi, a dog that has been the subject of court proceedings and in the headlines for some time.

Williams said Brindi was not the dog involved in Monday’s incident.

Although the shelter has asked the municipality to allow the dogs to have "socializing time outside of the shelter, such as walks outside of the shelter, we’ve been told we’re not permitted to do that," Williams said.

"It’s a very difficult situation for us."

The dog involved in Monday’s incident is "back in quarantine . . . but we haven’t received further direction from HRM other than to return her to kennel, which we’ve done," Williams said.

The municipality’s animal services division is investigating.

pbrooks@herald.ca)
© 2008 The Halifax Herald Limited


We don't want to seem overly critical, but we have to ask: who's irresponsible now, Kristin Williams? HRM? 


Whether or not it's an "isolated incident" matters little to the man, and even less under the law. The fact is that it happened, and there was no "due diligence". If they were ever charged, which we doubt will happen, this attack would likely earn the SPCA staff a guilty conviction in provincial court, if not also a euthanization order for the dog. One attack is enough, if the incident is severe enough.

The SPCA runs the HRM pound within the confines of the Metro Shelter, a modestly sized building. We have been led to believe the pound is kept separate from the rest of the shelter. So it's hard to understand how a dog could be walking around loose, especially when they know the place is going to be sprayed for bugs? Why wasn't anybody accompanying the man, or at least watching the dog? 

However, if the dog is loose (how can it be "untrue" it was not "secure"; it was out of the cage), we can easily understand how such an attack could happen. The SPCA pretty much admits these dogs are not given enough exercise, though they blame that on HRM. So the dog is bound to be a bit wired up, and react to a strange man - possibly holding some equipment, or wearing a mask, or whatever. But the bottom line is, this should not have happened. And somebody was indeed irresponsible.

Meanwhile, if what is said about Brindi is true, we are thrilled to note that in a year and a half of her illegal incarceration, Brindi has never bitten anybody, staff or stranger, at the pound. They say she is allowed to walk around too and obeys all the obedience commands her owner taught her. It's possible she was even loose at the time of this other attack, who knows? Such a dangerous dog!

How many people were taken to hospital on a gurney with an IV bag after Brindi attacked a dog? None. Are there any photos of injuries she caused? No. But that guy looks like he's really in pain! Yet the SPCA claims Brindi's owner is too irresponsible to have her own dog back - the one they love and say is so obedient! We think even an idiot could own Brindi and as long as they had a fence, everything would be fine. So we can't quite make the leap they'd like us to. And after today's interesting development, we suggest they all sit down and give it a little more thought. The rest of us can draw our own conclusions.

However, for the sake of Brindi's health, and the health of all of the animals there, what about the pest control being done? Exactly what kind of poisonous chemicals are these dogs being exposed to?? Were the dogs' feet protected from the spray? And what kinds of pests have infested the building? 

A Reader's Response to the Herald's "A Dog's Life in HRM"

 Da-dum & dumber idea; and a dog’s life in HRM 
BEV DAUPHINEE 

... UNFORTUNATELY, in HRM, one story has been dragging on far too long: the sad saga of Brindi, the six-year-old dog that has spent most of the last two years living in an SPCA shelter.

This week, a judge delayed proceedings until April 16 after Brindi’s owner, Francesca Rogier, asked for time to have a behavioural assessment done on her dog before its fate and Ms. Rogier’s sentence are decided. In February, Ms. Rogier was found guilty of violating Halifax Regional Municipality’s animal control bylaw on three charges, including owning a dog that attacked another animal.
This case has been debated in the media and on online sites since Brindi was seized by HRM’s Animal Services in the summer of 2008. We have received a lot of email, most of it coming from other parts of Canada and the U.S., generated by the online interest. In the past few weeks, we have received about a dozen locally written letters and published six of them, most pleading for Brindi’s return to her owner.
In an effort to save the dog from a possible euthanasia order, several Nova Scotian animal experts are advocating to have Brindi adopted by a suitable owner who can provide the dog with a good home and proper socialization skills.
Ms. Rogier has said she would appeal any decision that would not see Brindi eventually returned to her and she has accused HRM of conducting an "unfair" and "abusive" process.
I have no doubt Ms. Rogier loves her dog, but I do not believe the municipality has some sort of vendetta against her or Brindi, as has been suggested in many emails sent to our office.
Perhaps it is time to stop fighting for a principle and for everyone to concentrate on what is best for Brindi. If there is to be a way out of this mess for everyone — the HRM, Ms. Rogier, and especially Brindi — surely it is time to try to negotiate a happy ending to this story before it is too late.
bdauphinee@herald.ca)
Bev Dauphinee is editor of the Opinions pages for The Chronicle Herald.

(note: the letter below was written in response to the original article's clearer position in favor of re-homing Brindi)


> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:09:03 -0300
> From: Olive Pastor
> To: bdauphinee@herald.ca
> Subject: A Response to A dog's Life in HRM
>
> Ms Dauphinee:
>
> I will be the first to agree with you that this case of Brindi has dragged on too long. I will disagree with you that the HRM doesn't have a vendetta against Ms Rogier.  As far as I am concerned this is a case where a resident of the province has challenged the authority of a Municipal Government and she has been made pay for this financially and emotionally. Not to mention what the HRM has put this dog through in the last twenty months. As to the experts, Bob Ottenbrite was hired to train Brindi by Ms Rogier. It looks like he failed. And further, now he has gone on the attack to take Brindi away from Ms Rogier.  

As for the SPCA, Ms Williams is a Public Relations person talking to the media about finding a good home for Brindi.  She would certainly know how to put the spin on this to make the SPCA and HRM look good while making Ms Rogier look bad.


I have to ask, how objective is the SPCA on the subject, considering the lucurative contract they have had with HRM over the past number of years? Has any reporter ever researched into this, or even interviewed Ms Rogier so she could tell her whole story? I've only seen short write-ups about her case in court and what was said, not an interview. I also notice that Ottenbrite said he was threatened by one of Ms Rogier's supporters. Did he report this to the police? 

What was Ottenbrite's solution for taking Brindi? I think he was just going to kennel her and keep her there for the rest of her life. Has anyone ever researched into why Brindi acts in this manner because of her past life?  I don't think so. 

Ms. Rogier had told me she has received numerous threats against her. I never seen any of this reported by the media because I never saw an in-depth interview.  

I would also like to know why Brindi was not released by the Supreme Court when the kill order was quashed. It appears the door was left open for the Provincial Court to do the deed or to make it look like  they were doing the correct thing by taking the dog from her owner, that would give a win to HRM. 

As to Ms Rogier, I sympathize with what she is going through. Here are people speaking up saying the dog should go to a good home. Really! Ms Rogier has all the love and kindness and a good home that Brindi needs. Anyone who would fight for her dog like she has deserves to get her dog back. 


Peter Kelly could stop this right now but HRM will not back down. Are these the type of people we need in government? 

Here in Canada we are supposed to temper justice with understanding and kindness. I have seen nothing of this in the Brindi case. Nothing short of giving Brindi back to Ms Rogier is acceptable. How about doing a good in-depth interview with Ms Rogier before deciding who is right or wrong?

Olive Pastor
Pictou, N.S., B0K 1H0